After the COVID-19 pandemic stopped many asylum procedures across Europe, new technologies have become reviving these kinds of systems. Via lie diagnosis tools analyzed at the border to a program for confirming documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of systems is being employed in asylum applications. This article explores how these technologies have reshaped the ways asylum procedures are conducted. This reveals just how asylum seekers will be transformed into required hindered techno-users: They are asked to conform to a series of techno-bureaucratic steps also to keep up with unpredictable tiny within criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs their particular capacity to find their way these devices and to follow their legal right for proper protection.
It also demonstrates how these technologies will be embedded in refugee governance: They facilitate the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a flutter of spread technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by simply hindering them from accessing the channels of safeguards. It further states that examines of securitization and victimization should be put together with an insight into the disciplinary www.ascella-llc.com/generated-post-2/ mechanisms of the technologies, by which migrants will be turned into data-generating subjects who have are regimented by their dependence on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal know-how, the article states that these solutions have an inherent obstructiveness. They have a double effect: when they assist to expedite the asylum process, they also help to make it difficult designed for refugees to navigate these types of systems. They are positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes them vulnerable to illegitimate decisions created by non-governmental celebrities, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their circumstances. Moreover, they will pose fresh risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in incorrect or discriminatory outcomes.
()